Systematic Entomology

Robber flies or assassin flies (Diptera: Asilidae) are a diverse family of venomous predators. The most recent classification organizes Asilidae into 14 subfamilies based on a comprehensive morphological phylogeny, but many of these have not been supported in a subsequent molecular study using traditional molecular markers. To address questions of monophyly in Asilidae, we leveraged the recently developed Diptera-wide UCE baitset to compile seven datasets comprising 151 robber flies and 146 - 2,508 loci, varying in the extent of missing data. We also studied the behavior of different nodal support metrics, as the non-parametric bootstrap is known to perform poorly with large genomic datasets. Our ML phylogeny was fully resolved and well-supported, but partially incongruent with the coalescent phylogeny. Further examination of the datasets suggested the possibility that GC bias had influenced gene tree inference and subsequent species tree analysis. The subfamilies Brachyrhopalinae, Dasypogoninae, Dioctriinae, Stenopogoninae, Tillobromatinae, Trigonomiminae, and Willistonininae were not recovered as monophyletic in either analysis, consistent with a previous molecular study. The inter-subfamily relationships are summarized as follows: Laphriinae and Dioctriinae (in part) are successively sister to the remaining subfamilies, which form two clades; the first consists of a grade of Stenopogoninae (in part), Willistonininae (in part), Bathypogoninae+Phellinae, Stichopogoninae, Leptogastrinae, Ommatiinae, and Asilinae; the second clade consists of a thoroughly paraphyletic assemblage of genera from Dioctriinae (in part), Trigonomiminae, Stenopogoninae (in part), Tillobromatinae, Brachyrhopalinae, and Dasypogoninae. We find that nodal support does not significantly vary with missing data. Furthermore, the bootstrap appears to overestimate nodal support, as has been reported from many recent studies. Gene concordance and site concordance factors seem to perform better, but may actually underestimate support. We instead recommend quartet concordance as a more appropriate estimator of nodal support. Our comprehensive phylogeny demonstrates that the higher classification of Asilidae is far from settled, and it will provide a much-needed foundation for a thorough revision of the subfamily classification.

Recent developments in museomics enable genetic information to be recovered from previously unusable collection specimens and thus to answer complex taxonomic questions. Here we apply museomics to a taxonomic problem involving several species of Argyria Hubner (Pyraloidea, Crambinae), with previously unrecognized morphological variation. By analysing the DNA barcode (COI-5P) in numerous specimens, we aimed to reconstruct phylogenetic relationships between species, to provide better evidence for synonymies, and to circumscribe their geographical distribution. Using an innovative DNA hybridization capture protocol, we partially recovered the DNA barcode of the lectotype of Argyria lacteella (Fabricius, 1794) for comparison with the 229 DNA barcode sequences of Argyria specimens available in the Barcode of Life Datasystems, and this firmly establishes the identity of the species. The same protocol was used for the following type specimens: the Argyria abronalis (Walker, 1859) holotype, thus confirming the synonymy of this name with A. lacteella, the holotype of A. lusella (Zeller, 1863), rev. syn., the holotype of A. multifacta Dyar, 1914, syn. n., newly synonymized with A. lacteella, and a specimen of Argyria diplomochalis Dyar, 1913, collected in 1992. A complementary sampling composed of nine specimens of A. lacteella, A. diplomochalis, A. centrifugens Dyar, 1914 and A. gonogramma Dyar, 1915, from North to South America, were integrated using classical COI amplification and Sanger sequencing. Argyria gonogramma Dyar, described from Bermuda, is the name to be applied to the more widespread North American species formerly identified as A. lacteella. Following morphological study of its holotype, Argyria vestalis Butler, 1878, syn. n. is also synonymized with A. lacteella. The name A. pusillalis Hubner, 1818, is considered a nomen dubium associated with A. gonogramma. The adult morphology is diagnosed and illustrated, and distributions are plotted for A. lacteella, A. diplomochalis, A. centrifugens, and A. gonogramma based on slightly more than 800 specimens. For the first time, DNA barcode sequences are provided for the Antillean A. diplomochalis. Our work highlights the efficiency of the DNA hybrid capture enrichment method to retrieve DNA barcodes from 18th and 19th century type specimens in order to solve taxonomic issues in Lepidoptera.

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWThis study reconstructs the phylogeny of an expansive set of Neotropical leaf beetles in the subfamily Chrysomelinae. From 33 species in the genus Platyphora Gistel, and an additional 37 species representing 16 beetle genera, five genes, three nuclear, and two mitochondrial, were sequenced and used to obtain a well-supported molecular phylogeny using both Bayesian and Maximum Likelihood. The subtribes Chrysomelina and Doryphorina (sensu Daccordi 1982) were monophyletic, while the genus Platyphora was polyphyletic. The genus Leptinotarsa Chevrolat is confirmed to be distinct from Stilodes Chevrolat. Host plant family was recorded for both adults and larvae using direct observations where possible. Ancestral host plant use was reconstructed using Bayesian trait analyses. A complicated history of host plant switches among a restricted set of plant families is revealed: In the paraphyletic Platyphora, one clade that includes Proseicela and Leptinotarsa had two switches from Asclepiadiodeae to Solanaceae, one switch to Moraceae, and one switch to Malpighiaceae, another Platyphora clade had switches between Asteraceae and Rauvolfioideae, and from Rauvolfioideae to Asclepiadiodeae, with other members of the same clade feeding on Boraginaceae and Convolvulaceae. All species included in the clade containing Tritaenia and Stilodes fed on Malpighiaceae, and all species included in the Cosmogramma and Calligrapha clade fed on Malvaceae.

Here we present a taxonomic revision of all neotropical Costaceae represented by 90 species, distributed in four monophyletic genera, Chamaecostus (9 spp.), Costus (76 spp.), Dimerocostus (5 spp.), and Monocostus (1 sp.). The work resulted in three new combinations, several nomenclatural changes, and four insufficiently known species are mentioned to demonstrate the need for continued and ongoing work on this charismatic yet often cryptic lineage of plants. We highlight the seventeen species of Costus and one species of Chamaecostus that were recently described (Maas et al. 2023) based on knowledge that emerged during this complete revisionary work, 60 years in the making. Included in this revision are details concerning the morphology, distribution, ecology, and phylogenetic relationships among the species studied. All currently recognized species are fully described, including notes on taxonomic synonymy, lectotypification, information on distribution and ecology, conservation status (either as evaluated and published in the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species or as estimated for this publication), vernacular names (when given) and short taxonomic notes. For each species, a distribution map is prepared and at least one colour photograph is included to assist in species identification. Dichotomous keys that include all species are provided, as is a list of all (c. 11.000) exsiccatae studied and an index to scientific names.

We provide the first comprehensive analysis of the origin of two enigmatic Satyrinae genera of uncertain affinities. Calisto, the only Satyrinae genus from the West Indies and endemic to these islands, has resisted numerous attempts at phylogenetic placement, regardless of the data type or methods used. Llorenteana, a monotypic genus from northwestern Mexico, has never been included in a molecular phylogenetic study, and past authors have placed it in five different genera and subtribes. We used mostly published genomic data, but also newly sequenced whole genome data from museum specimens and old DNA extracts, extracted BUSCO genes and prepared several datasets. These datasets differed in the degree of heterogeneity and saturation, the number of nucleotide positions used (all positions or only the first two), and were analyzed as nucleotides or as amino acids. We employed several methods for phylogenetic reconstruction using both partitioned and mixture models, as well as ASTRAL, and we inferred divergence times and ancestral areas of origin for Calisto and Llorenteana. The phylogenetic placement of Calisto varied among datasets when we used partitioned models and ASTRAL; however, most datasets resulted in the same relationships under mixture models. Our results suggest that Calisto is part of a clade of Old World origin that colonized the New World from north to south, thus sharing ancestry with Nearctic taxa. Llorenteana constitutes one of the earliest splits within the Euptychiina, a subtribe of Neotropical origin, but descending together with the Pronophilina from Nearctic ancestors. We propose the recognition of Erebiina stat. rev. as the only subtribe comprising the former Calistina syn. nov., Callerebiina syn. nov, Maniolina syn. nov., and Ypthimina syn. nov.

Macromiidae is a widely distributed lineage of libelluloid dragonflies with a largely allopatric genus-level distribution across the Holarctic, Afrotropical, Australasian, and Indo-Malayan regions. Previous studies involving this family have been complicated by morphological convergence and limited phylogenetic sampling. Here, we present the most densely sampled phylogenetic framework for Macromiidae to date, using Anchored Hybrid Enrichment data from 62 of the 125 described species. Our sampling represents all four genera and major geographic regions, including Libelluloid and Cordulegastrid outgroups. Maximum likelihood recovered three major lineages: Epophthalmia, Phyllomacromia, and Macromia sensu lato, with Epophthalmia strongly supported as sister to Phyllomacromia. Didymops was not recovered as monophyletic and was placed within Macromia, although deeper relationships within the Macromia complex showed some gene tree discordance. We additionally scored seven male genitalic characters and reconstructed their evolution across a dated phylogeny. We revealed that these traits varied heavily in phylogenetic signal, with some characters supporting the major clades and others showing high degree of homoplasy. Fossil-calibrated divergence time estimation placed the crown origin of Macromiidae in the late Oligocene (24 Ma), with other major intrafamilial divergences concentrated in the Miocene. Historical biogeographic reconstructions consistently supported Afrotropical origins for Phyllomacromia, Indo-Malayan centered ancestry for Epophthalmia, and a multi-region history for Macromia + Didymops spanning Indo-Malayan, Australasian, and Nearctic regions. Habitat reconstructions favored lentic ancestry for Macromiidae, and diversification rate variation was best explained by trait-independent models rather than lentic/lotic habitat association.

Diversisporales comprises species with worldwide distribution that produce glomoid, otosporoid, or tricisporoid spores. The recent reorganization of the order by Oehl et al. (2016) recognizes two families, Diversisporaceae and Corymbiglomeraceae, comprising one and five genera, respectively. Several Glomeromycotan specimens collected in northern and southeastern Mexico and in French Polynesian atolls were characterized using both morphological and molecular analyses. Phylogenetic inference revealed that they represent new members in the Diversisporales, supporting the reorganization of the genus Redeckera into three independent lineages: Albocarpum gen. nov., with A. arenaceum sp. nov., A. leptohyphum sp. nov., and A. fulvum comb. nov., Pulvinocarpum pulvinatum gen. et comb. nov., and Redeckera, which retains five species, including R. varelae sp. nov. In addition, we described Melanocarpum mexicanum gen. et sp. nov. and Diversispora papillosa sp. nov. A broader phylogeny, based on eDNA sequences and representative of Diversisporales species, including the newly described taxa, further supported the split of Redeckera and suggested three additional clades likely corresponding to a new family and two new genera, awaiting the discovery of representative morphospecies to be formally described. Using eDNA sequences metadata, the occurrences of the newly described taxa were mapped, allowing to recognize distribution patterns, mostly in the pantropical zone, distinguish widespread and rare species, and suggest possible endemisms. Finally, the coexistence of species forming large sporocarps (A. fulvum and A. leptohyphum) alongside species forming spores in loose aggregates (A. arenaceum), prompted us to propose a possible sporulation dimorphism in Albocarpum, an argument previously raised to explain the nested placement of Corymbiglomus and Paracorymbiglomus within the Redeckera clade.

Abstract"Open ended" or "dark taxa" are species-rich clades that are so abundant and diverse that conventional taxonomic methods tend to struggle with the onslaught of specimens and species. New approaches based on presorting specimens to putative species with low-cost DNA barcodes may make tackling these taxa manageable. However, this will still require limiting the geographic scope of taxonomic revisions, given that most countries and biogeographic regions will have too many specimens and species for comprehensive coverage. We demonstrate the power of this approach by carrying out a revision of the Mycetophilidae fungus gnats (Diptera) of Singapore. The material revised here was obtained from 496 samples collected with 71 Malaise traps placed at 107 sites in different habitats in Singapore: mangroves, swamp forests, freshwater swamps, primary rainforests, and different types of secondary forests (old, maturing, young, urban). Based on molecular and morphological data for 1,454 specimens, we delimit 120 species of 23 genera. Of these, only five were species previously described. The remaining 115 species are new to science and described here. We name, however, only 98 of these species since 14 species are currently only known from females and we cannot prepare a fully satisfying morphological diagnosis (Manota spp. A-G and Neoempheria spp. A-G), and three species lack molecular data (Epicypta sp. A, Epicypta sp. B, and Neoempheria sp. H). To assess congruence between species delimited with DNA barcodes (3% clusters) and morphology, we determined a match ratio and found it to be overall high (95%) with even higher match ratios (99%) observed for MOTUs clustered at 5% with Objective Clustering and MOTUs obtained with ABGD set to (P=0.060). Overall, the ratio of undescribed to described is an astonishing 20:1. Only revising the Singapore fauna increases the number of described species of Oriental Mycetophilidae by about 25%, highlighting the size of the taxonomic impediment for fungus gnats. Most of the Singapore Mycetophilidae diversity belongs to three genera--Neoempheria Osten-Sacken (31 species), Epicypta Winnertz (29 species) and Manota Williston (14 species), but we also describe a new genus-- Integricypta, gen. n., which is the putative sistergroup of Aspidionia Colless--belonging to the Mycetophilinae Mycetophilini based on three species. The species sequenced, illustrated, and named are: Leptomorphus rafflesi, sp. n.; Monoclona simhapura, sp. n.; Azana demeijeri, sp. n.; Azana leekongchiani, sp. n. (Sciophilinae); Tetragoneura crawfurdi, sp. n.; Tetragoneura chola, sp. n.; Tetragoneura dayuan, sp. n.; Tetragoneura farquhari, sp. n.; Ectrepesthoneura johor, sp. n. (Tetragoneurinae); Mohelia zubirsaidi, sp. n.; Allactoneura tumasik, sp. n.; Allactoneura limbosengi, sp. n.; Manota banzu, sp. n.; Manota tantocksengi, sp. n.; Manota bukittimah, sp. n.; Manota chiamassie, sp. n.; Manota danmaxi, sp. n.; Manota mahuan, sp. n.; Manota temenggong, sp. n.; Clastobasis sritribuana, sp. n.; Clastobasis bugis, sp. n.; Clastobasis oranglaut, sp. n. (Leiinae); Parempheriella mait, sp. n.; Parempheriella longyamen, sp. n.; Parempheriella peranakan, sp. n.; Mycomya sachmatich, sp. n.; Neoempheria merlio, sp. n.; Neoempheria sabana, sp. n.; Neoempheria sangabo, sp. n.; Neoempheria shicheng, sp. n.; Neoempheria ujong, sp. n.; Neoempheria subaraji, sp. n.; Neoempheria kokoiyeeae, sp. n.; Neoempheria mandai, sp. n.; Neoempheria malacca, sp. n.; Neoempheria sinkapho, sp. n.; Neoempheria singapura, sp. n.; Neoempheria xinjiapo, sp. n.; Neoempheria puluochung, sp. n.; Neoempheria merdeka, sp. n.; Neoempheria neesoon, sp. n.; Neoempheria pulau, sp. n.; Neoempheria cinkappur, sp. n.; Neoempheria temasek, sp. n.; Neoempheria polunini, sp. n.; Neoempheria fajar, sp. n.; Neoempheria riatanae, sp. n. (Mycomyinae); Brachycampta glorialimae, sp. n.; Brachycampta murphyi, sp. n.; Brachycampta limtzepengi, sp. n.; Rymosia teopohlengi, sp. n.; Exechia tanswiehiani, sp. n.; Exechia alinewongae, sp. n.; Mycetophila chngseoktinae, sp. n.; Mycetophila georgettechenae, sp. n.; Mycetophila aishae, sp. n.; Platyprosthiogyne phanwaithongae, sp. n.; Platyprosthiogyne gohsookhimae, sp. n.; Platyprosthiogyne rahimahae, sp. n.; Platyprosthiogyne lynetteseahae, sp. n.; Platyprosthiogyne neilaae, sp. n.; Platyprosthiogyne snehalethaae, sp. n.; Platurocypta adeleneweeae, sp. n.; Platurocypta tanhoweliangi, sp. n.; Epicypta constancesingamae, sp. n.; Epicypta jennylauae, sp. n.; Epicypta limchiumeiae, sp. n.; Epicypta janetyeeae, sp. n.; Epicypta kohkhenglianae, sp. n.; Epicypta daintoni, sp. n.; Epicypta holltumi, sp.n.; Epicypta ridleyi, sp. n.; Epicypta chezaharaae, sp. n.; Epicypta tanjiakkimi, sp. n.; Epicypta gehminae, sp. n.; Epicypta jackieyingae, sp. n.; Epicypta khatijunae, sp. n.; Epicypta purchoni, sp. n.; Epicypta foomaoshengi, sp. n.; Epicypta ganengsengi, sp. n.; Epicypta nanyangu, sp. n.; Epicypta nus, sp. n.; Epicypta peterngi, sp. n.; Epicypta maggielimae, sp. n.; Epicypta yupeigaoae, sp. n.; Epicypta annwee, sp. n.; Epicypta wallacei, sp. n.; Epicypta lamtoongjini, sp. n.; Epicypta catherinelimae, sp. n.; Epicypta grootaerti, sp. n.; Epicypta joaquimae, sp. n.; Aspidionia cheesweeleeae, sp. n.; Aspidionia janetjesudasonae, sp. n.; Aspidionia fatimahae, sp. n.; Integricypta fergusondavie, sp. n.; Integricypta teosoonkimae, sp. n.; Integricypta shirinae, sp. n.; Integricypta hoyuenhoeae, sp. n. (Mycetophilinae). The previously described species are Metanepsia malaysiana Kallweit, Eumanota racola Soli, Parempheriella defectiva (Edwards), Neoempheria dizonalis (Edwards) (all known from Sumatra and/or the Malaysian peninsula), and Chalastonepsia hokkaidensis Kallweit a species spread in east Asia. The mycomyine genus Vecella Wu & Yang is here proposed as a new synonym to Parempheriella, with P. guadunana (Wu & Yang), n. comb. corresponding to an additional Palearctic species of Parempheriella. Barcodes for a second set of 1,493 Singapore mycetophilid specimens suggest the presence of an additional 18 MOTUs. We thus estimate that approximately 85% of all the Singapore species that routinely enter Malaise traps are identified or described here. The revision concludes with a discussion of the biogeography and generic composition of the mycetophilid fauna at the southern end of the Malay Peninsula. Zusammenfassung"Open-ended" oder "Dark Taxa" sind artenreiche Klade, die so abundant und arteinreich sind, dass die herkommlichen taxonomischen Methoden angesichts der gro{beta}en Anzahl von Exemplaren und Arten nicht gut funktionieren. Neue Ansatze, die auf das Vorsortierung von Exemplaren mit DNA Barcodes bis zum Artniveau basieren, erlauben es jetzt aber solche Taxa zu revidieren. Allerdings kann auch mit DNA Barcodes, nur die Fauna eines vergleichsweise kleinen Gebietes bearbeiten werden, weil fur die meisten Lander und biogeografischen Regionen zu viele Exemplare und Arten abgedeckt werden mussten. Wir demonstrieren hier wie eine solche Revision durchgefuhrt werden kann. Wir revidieren hier die Pilzmucken (Diptera: Mycetophilidae) von Singapur, die mit Malaisefallen gefangen werden konnen. Das hier uberarbeitete Material stammt aus 496 Malaise-Fallenproben, die mit 71 Malaise-Fallen an 107 Sammelstellen in verschiedenen Habitaten gefangen wurden: Mangroven, Sumpfwalder, Su{beta}wassersumpfe, Primarregenwalder und Sekundarwalder. Basierend auf molekularen und morphologischen Daten fur mehr als 1454 Tiere grenzen wir 120 Arten mit molekularen und morphologischen Daten ab, wobei nur 5 dieser Arten bereits beschrieben sind. Die verbleibenden 115 werden hier beschrieben. Allerdings benennen wir nur 98 Arten, da fur zwei Arten molekulare Daten fehlen und fur 14 weitere Arten derzeit nur Weibchen bekannt sind. Daher konnen wir derzeit keine zufriedenstellende morphologische Diagnose erstellen. Daruber hinaus fehlen molekulare Daten fur drei Arten (Epicypta sp. A, Epicypta sp. B und Neoempheria sp. H). Was die Artgrenzen betrifft, so stimmen die molekularen und morphologischen Daten in den meisten Fallen uberein (match ratio: 95% fur 3% MOTUs). Eine noch hohere "match ratio" von 99% wird fur 5% und ABGD MOTUs (P=0,060) beobachtet. Insgesamt ist das Verhaltnis zwischen unbeschrieben und beschrieben erstaunlich hoch (20:1), und die Uberarbeitung der singapurer Fauna erhoht die Anzahl der beschriebenen Arten in der Orientalischen Region um uber 25%. Dies unterstreicht den Ausma{beta} des "taxonomic impediments" fur Pilzmucken. Die meisten der Mycetophilidenarten in Singapur gehoren zu drei von 22 Gattungen - Neoempheria Osten-Sacken (31 Arten), Epicypta Winnertz (29 Arten) und Manota Williston (14 Arten), aber wir beschreiben hier auch eine neue Gattung, Integricypta, gen. n. basierend auf drei Arten. Die Gattung gehort zu den Mycetophilinae Mycetophilini und ist die mutma{beta}liche Schwestergruppe von Aspidionia Colless. Die sequenzierten, illustrierten und benannten Arten sind: Leptomorphus rafflesi, sp. n.; Monoclona simhapura, sp. n.; Azana demeijeri, sp. n.; Azana leekongchiani, sp. n. (Sciophilinae); Tetragoneura crawfurdi, sp. n.; Tetragoneura chola, sp. n.; Tetragoneura dayuan, sp. n.; Tetragoneura farquhari, sp. n.; Ectrepesthoneura johor, sp. n. (Tetragoneurinae); Mohelia zubirsaidi, sp. n.; Allactoneura tumasik, sp. n.; Allactoneura limbosengi, sp. n.; Manota banzu, sp. n.; Manota tantocksengi, sp. n.; Manota bukittimah, sp. n.; Manota chiamassie, sp. n.; Manota danmaxi, sp. n.; Manota mahuan, sp. n.; Manota temenggong, sp. n.; Clastobasis sritribuana, sp. n.; Clastobasis bugis, sp. n.; Clastobasis oranglaut, sp. n. (Leiinae); Parempheriella mait, sp. n.; Parempheriella longyamen, sp. n.; Parempheriella peranakan, sp. n.; Mycomya sachmatich, sp. n.; Neoempheria merlio, sp. n.; Neoempheria sabana, sp. n.; Neoempheria sangabo, sp. n.; Neoempheria shicheng, sp. n.; Neoempheria ujong, sp. n.; Neoempheria subaraji, sp. n.; Neoempheria kokoiyeeae, sp. n.; Neoempheria mandai, sp. n.; Neoempheria malacca, sp. n.; Neoempheria sinkapho, sp. n.; Neoempheria singapura, sp. n.; Neoempheria xinjiapo, sp. n.; Neoempheria puluochung, sp. n.; Neoempheria merdeka, sp. n.; Neoempheria neesoon, sp. n.; Neoempheria pulau, sp. n.; Neoempheria cinkappur, sp. n.; Neoempheria temasek, sp. n.; Neoempheria polunini, sp. n.; Neoempheria fajar, sp. n.; Neoempheria riatanae, sp. n. (Mycomyinae); Brachycampta glorialimae, sp. n.; Brachycampta murphyi, sp. n.; Brachycampta limtzepengi, sp. n.; Rymosia teopohlengi, sp. n.; Exechia tanswiehiani, sp. n.; Exechia alinewongae, sp. n.; Mycetophila chngseoktinae, sp. n.; Mycetophila georgettechenae, sp. n.; Mycetophila aishae, sp. n.; Platyprosthiogyne phanwaithongae, sp. n.; Platyprosthiogyne gohsookhimae, sp. n.; Platyprosthiogyne rahimahae, sp. n.; Platyprosthiogyne lynetteseahae, sp. n.; Platyprosthiogyne neilaae, sp. n.; Platyprosthiogyne snehalethaae, sp. n.; Platurocypta adeleneweeae, sp. n.; Platurocypta tanhoweliangi, sp. n.; Epicypta constancesingamae, sp. n.; Epicypta jennylauae, sp. n.; Epicypta limchiumeiae, sp. n.; Epicypta janetyeeae, sp. n.; Epicypta kohkhenglianae, sp. n.; Epicypta daintoni, sp. n.; Epicypta holltumi, sp.n.; Epicypta ridleyi, sp. n.; Epicypta chezaharaae, sp. n.; Epicypta tanjiakkimi, sp. n.; Epicypta gehminae, sp. n.; Epicypta jackieyingae, sp. n.; Epicypta khatijunae, sp. n.; Epicypta purchoni, sp. n.; Epicypta foomaoshengi, sp. n.; Epicypta ganengsengi, sp. n.; Epicypta nanyangu, sp. n.; Epicypta nus, sp. n.; Epicypta peterngi, sp. n.; Epicypta maggielimae, sp. n.; Epicypta yupeigaoae, sp. n.; Epicypta annwee, sp. n.; Epicypta wallacei, sp. n.; Epicypta lamtoongjini, sp. n.; Epicypta catherinelimae, sp. n.; Epicypta grootaerti, sp. n.; Epicypta joaquimae, sp. n.; Aspidionia cheesweeleeae, sp. n.; Aspidionia janetjesudasonae, sp. n.; Aspidionia fatimahae, sp. n.; Integricypta fergusondavie, sp. n.; Integricypta teosoonkimae, sp. n.; Integricypta shirinae, sp. n.; Integricypta hoyuenhoeae, sp. n. (Mycetophilinae). Die Tiere, die zu den bereits beschriebenen Arten gehoren, gehoren zu den folgenden Arten: Metanepsia malaysiana Kallweit, Eumanota racola Soli, Parempheriella defectiva (Edwards), Neoempheria dizonalis (Edwards) (alle Arten sind derzeit aus Sumatra und/oder der malaysischen Halbinsel bekannt), und Chalastonepsia hokkaidensis Kallweit, eine in Ostasien verbreitete Art. Die Gattung Vecella Wu & Yang wird hier als neues Synonym fur Parempheriella vorgeschlagen, wobei P. guadunana (Wu & Yang), n. comb., wobei die Gattung damit eine zusatzlichen palaarktischen Art erhalt. Die DNA Barcodes fur eine zweite Stichprobe mit 1.493 Pilzmucken deuten darauf hin, dass in Singapur 18 zusatzliche Arten mit Malaisefallen gefangen werden konnen. Es sieht aber dennoch so aus, als wurden wir bereits hier circa 85% aller Arten beschreiben, die regelma{beta}ig in Malaise-Fallen geraten. Die Revision endet mit einer Diskussion der Biogeographie und taxonomische Zusammensetzung der Mycetophilidenfauna im sudlichen Teil der Malaiischen Halbinsel.

We investigated generic relationships in the ingoid clade (Fabaceae) (sensu Koenen & al. 2020a), with main focus on genera with a taxonomic history in Calliandra s.l. of the tribe Ingeae (i.e. Afrocalliandra, Calliandra s.s., Sanjappa, Thailentadopsis, Viguieranthus, Zapoteca), and three genera of the tribe Acacieae (i.e., Acacia, Acaciella, Senegalia). The nuclear ribosomal ETS and ITS, and the plastid matK, trnL-trnF and ycf1 DNA-regions were analysed for 246 representatives from 36 genera using maximum likelihood as implemented in IQ-tree. The results show an Ingeae-Acacia clade within the ingoid clade, resolved in three major clades. Clade 1 (Calliandra s.s. and Afrocalliandra) is sister to clades 2 and 3. Clade 2 comprises Faidherbia, Sanjappa, Thailentadopsis, Viguieranthus and Zapoteca. Clade 3 comprises the remaining genera of the Ingeae, plus Acacia. The ingoid genus Senegalia is excluded from the Ingeae-Acacia clade. Acaciella is sister to the remaining ingoid clade when nuclear ribosomal data is included in the analyses, but included in the Ingeae-Acacia clade based on plastid data. Acacia and perhaps also Acaciella are thus nested within Ingeae. Species traditionally referred to Calliandra (Calliandra s.l.) are resolved in two clades, and the "Calliandra-pod" has apparently evolved independently several times.

The use of molecular data to study evolutionary history of different organisms, revolutionized the field of systematics. Now with the appearance of high throughput sequencing (HTS) technologies more and more genetic sequence data is available. One of the important sources of genetic data for phylogenetic analyses has been mitochondrial DNA. The limitations of mitochondrial DNA for the study of phylogenetic relationships have been thoroughly explored in the age of single locus phylogenies. Now with the appearance of genomic scale data, more and more mitochondrial genomes are available. Here we assemble 47 mitochondrial genomes using whole genome Illumina short reads of representatives of the family Erebidae (Lepidoptera), in order to evaluate the accuracy of mitochondrial genome application in resolving deep phylogenetic relationships. We find that mitogenomes are inadequate for resolving subfamily level relationships in Erebidae, but given good taxon sampling, we see its potential in resolving lower level phylogenetic relationships.

The genus Farlowella has been historically challenging, in part due to the difficulty in defining diagnostic characters which allow to clearly set apart and identify the species. Farlowella colombiensis Retzer & Page 1997 is one of such examples, whose diagnostic characters were based on caudal-fin colour pattern, body cover ventral pattern, and details of the head. We herein reassess the taxonomic status of this species against congeners of the F. acus species group (F. acus, F. martini, F. mitoupibo, F. venezuelensis, and F. vittata). We found no significant differences between F. colombiensis and F. acus in morphometric, meristic, and discrete characters, therefore rendering Farlowella colombiensis a junior synonym of Farlowella acus. We provide remarks on different species of the F. acus group in Colombia, as well as description of sexual dimorphism in the genital papilla for the first time in the subfamily. We also provide a key to the species of the F. acus species group in Colombia.

Geometric morphometrics based on two-dimensional landmarks is a powerful tool for distinguishing morphologically similar or cryptic taxa, an important asset in the fight against medically and veterinary important arthropods. While it is commonly assumed that increasing the number of landmarks should improve discriminatory power by capturing more shape information, our findings challenge this assumption. In terms of shape discrimination, we demonstrate that small subsets of landmarks can outperform full sets of landmarks. Examples are given in 6 insect families: Culicidae, Glossinidae, Muscidae, Psychodidae, Reduviidae and Tabanidae. In all of these examples where landmark-based geometric morphometry was effective in separating morphologically close taxa, the total number of landmarks was not as effective as some significantly smaller subsets. To find such performing subsets, we used a random approach. Thus, for each number of landmarks (subsets), we examined a random sample of their many possible combinations. This random search was compared to a simpler approach, called the hierarchical method, based on the contribution of each landmark to the overall distance between shapes. Both procedures have been integrated into the XYOM online software, providing accessible tools for efficient landmark selection and improved morphometric analysis. Author summaryLandmark-based geometric morphometrics describes shape in direct relation to the number of landmarks used. It is commonly assumed that increasing the number of landmarks allows for more information about shape, and when discriminating between groups or taxa, this strategy is expected to improve classification accuracy. Our results challenge this assumption. We demonstrate that subsets of landmarks, as small as three or four, can outperform the species classification obtained by the full set of landmarks, and we propose two methods for identifying them. We analyze the possible causes of these counter-intuitive results and the perspectives they could open for morphometric studies.

Despite tropical psocids comprise ~60% of species diversity within the Psocidae (Insecta, Psocodea), previous studies on the Psocidae phylogeny have poorly sampled tropical species (<40% species in trees). Here we discuss the evolution and systematics of the Psocidae based on the most comprehensive species-level sampling of the Psocidae. We sequenced and inferred the phylogenetic position of 43 previously unsampled Neotropical species from COI, H3, WNT, 18S, 16S, and 12S. Based on our phylogenies we found that Neotropical psocids are generally not closely related to morphologically similar taxa in the Holarctic region. Consequently, the monophyletic status for the major groups within Psocidae (subfamilies and tribes) is recovered only when Holarctic groups are sampled (7-10 of 11 higher-level groups are monophyletic) but violated when Neotropical species are included in the dataset (1 of 11 higher-level groups are monophyletic). Leveraging the largest phylogeny of the Psocidae, our study pinpoints the downfalls of simply extending taxonomic knowledge from lineages of a certain area to inform diversity and evolution of lineages in other regions. HighlightsO_LITropical psocids comprise >60% of the extant family richness C_LIO_LIPrevious phylogenies have undersampled Tropical psocids C_LIO_LIHolarctic and Neotropical species are classified under the same morphological groups C_LIO_LIHolarctic and Neotropical generally correspond to evolutionarily distinct lineages C_LIO_LIPhylogenies based on Holarctic psocids poorly inform evolution in the Neotropics C_LI

Planthoppers (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha) are a species-rich and globally distributed insect clade with high economic, ecological, and evolutionary importance. However, the relationships among planthopper lineages and families remain unclear. Previous efforts based on inconsistent morphological traits, a few genes, or limited sampling often resulted in conflicting tree topologies. Here, we used genome-level data to assemble 1164 nuclear single-copy genes and 13 mitochondrial protein-coding genes for 149 planthopper species representing 19 out of 21 extant families. Additional markers were added from published mitogenomes, expanding our sampling to 285 species. These markers were used for Maximum Likelihood-based tree inference and dating analyses. The newly inferred phylogenies validated well-accepted relationships and recovered novel placements. Taxonomic conclusions include the establishment of a new family Borysthenidae stat. rev. within Delphacoidea and a new superfamily Meenoploidea superfam. nov. including redefined Kinnaridae stat. rev. and Meenoplidae stat. rev., the confirmation of the monophyletic family Achilixiidae outside the Achilidae-Derbidae clade, and the transfer of tribes Lyncidini and Amyclini to Dictyopharidae and the genus Madagascaritia to Fulgoridae. The time analyses based on 57 nuclear markers and 30 fossils dated the origin of crown Fulgoromorpha back to Guadalupian, Permian ([~]263 Ma), close to the maximum constraint at 267.3 Ma, while applying an older root constraint resulted in an origin in Mississippian, Carboniferous ([~]332 Ma). While future sampling of unstudied fauna in unexplored regions or habitats may change the topology, the current phylogenomic analysis will serve as a solid foundation for research into planthopper ecology, evolution, and significance.

The Urticaceae (ca. 2600 species) were first formally recognized by Jussieu in the 18th century and last comprehensively monographed by Weddell in the 19th century. Since Weddells work, family delimitation has been modified and many genera described in a fragmented manner. Over the past two decades, numerous molecular studies have supported the inclusion of Cecropiaceae within Urticaceae and identified paraphyly in several genera, notably Laportea, Urera, Boehmeria, Parietaria, Pellionia, and Pouzolzia. However, few studies have translated these molecular insights into a revised taxonomy. This study aimed to provide a robust, updated classification for Urticaceae by: a) increasing taxon and genomic locus sampling through the integration of newly generated sequence data with previously published datasets; and b) incorporating morphological data to support a revised delimitation of tribes and genera, and to establish a new linear sequence for the family. We also sought to identify remaining taxonomic challenges. Using Sanger and Angiosperms353 sequence data, we constructed a phylogenetic framework for 57 out of 59 currently accepted genera. We also assessed the phylogenetic informativeness of 57 morphological characters by mapping them onto the phylogeny. Our analyses support the delimitation of 61 monophyletic genera and an infrafamilial classification comprising seven tribes, two of which we describe as new: Myriocarpeae and Leukosykeae. We provide a revised linear sequence for the family. Our classification reinstates several names previously treated as synonyms (Fleurya, Leptocnide, Margarocarpus, Polychroa, Scepocarpus, Sceptrocnide), places several genera in synonymy (Hemistylus and Rousselia under Pouzolzia; Hesperocnide under Urtica; Gesnouinia and Soleirolia under Parietaria), and proposes the recognition of two new genera, Muimar gen. nov. and Pouzolziella gen. nov., to accommodate Boehmeria nivea and Pouzolzia australis, respectively. Mapping morphological characters onto the phylogeny indicates that while most states are homoplastic at the family level, their combination is valuable for recognizing genera. Geographic character mapping suggests a high degree of spatial conservatism at the genus rank. Our dated ultrametric tree suggests an origin for Urticaceae in Indomalaya during the mid-Cretaceous, followed by establishment in the Laurasian boreotropical flora and subsequent dispersal to the neotropics and Africa. Once classified within an evolutionary framework we believe that the Urticaceae represent a valuable study system in evolutionary biology for investigating transitions across biomes, the drivers of floral trait evolution, and intrinsic speciation mechanisms. New tribes: --Leukosykeae, Myriocarpeae New genera: --Muimar, Pouzolziella

Based on a previously published but realigned matrix for Santalales, we find many relationships that were weakly or unsupported in previous studies are here much better supported, providing a more robust foundation upon which to discuss Santalales classification. In the maximum likelihood analysis, we recovered the same basic relationships as in the previous studies, but with two major differences: i) Balanophoraceae in the broad sense are monophyletic and well supported as embedded in Santalaceae (rather than biphyletic and outside Santalaceae) and ii) most of the former Olacaceae form a moderately supported clade (rather than a weakly supported grade). In the parsimony analysis, the position of Balanophoraceae s.l. is not well supported (although their broader circumscription is). We outline three possible options for a classification of the order and propose a new familial and subfamilial classification for Santalales. This hopefully provides a stable, user- friendly taxonomic framework that is phylogenetically well supported and more consistent with historical usage than some recently proposed systems, and provides taxa that can be more readily diagnosed morphologically. We recommend recognition of nine families (in phylogenetic sequence): Strombosiaceae, Erythropalaceae, Olacaceae, Opiliaceae, Santalaceae, Misodendraceae, Schoepfiaceae and Loranthaceae, plus an unresolved position for Balanophoraceae (including Mystropetalaceae), which we propose to exclude from Santalaceae until more evidence of their relationships to that family is available from nuclear genes. Four new subfamilies, Gaiadendroideae, Comandroideae, Nanodeoideae and Thesioideae, are proposed, and a new combination, Loranthus obtusifolius, is made.

The subfamily Lamiinae (Cerambycidae, Coleoptera) is striking due to its morphological diversity and species richness with intricate phylogenetic relationships. We inferred the phylogeny and evolutionary history of extant species of East of Marmara Basin, Turkiye, from the tribes Acanthocinini, Acanthoderini, Agapanthiini, Batocerini, Dorcadionini, Lamiini, Mesosini, Monochamini, Phytoeciini, Phrynetini, Pogonocherini (including Exocentrini) and Saperdini using partial mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase-I (COI) and 16S rRNA and nuclear 28S rRNA gene regions (2257 base pair alignment length). The most recent common ancestor (MRCA) of Lamiinae members included in the analyses was dated [~]127 million years ago (Mya) in the Cretaceous. The MRCA of Dorcadionini, Lamiini and Monochamini was younger than the common ancestors of the other close tribes. There was a concurrence between resolutions of Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian analyses on the affiliations of Dorcadionini and Monochamini to Lamiini and the proximity of Batocerini to Lamiini, Acanthocinini to Acanthoderini, Phrynetini to Pogonocherini, and Phytoeciini to Saperdini. The COI-based Neighbor-Joining and ML gene trees suggest that the closest relatives of the extant Lamiinae species of East of Marmara Basin were the European conspecifics or congeners. Moreover, Paraleprodera and Lamia (Lamiini) were sisters to Imantocera (Gnomini), Oberea (Obereini) to Phytoecia Phytoeciini), and Hippopsis (Agapanthiini) to Omosarotes singularis Pascoe, 1860 (Acanthomerosternoplini). Our results support Dorcadionini, Gnomini and Monochamini as synonyms of Lamiini; and Obereini and Phytoeciini of Saperdini and suggest that the emergence of the living tribes included in this study was during Paleogene, and their intrageneric diversifications occurred during Cenozoic, mostly Neogene.

PremiseMagnoliidae are a strongly supported clade of angiosperms. Previous phylogenetic studies based primarily on analyses of a limited number of mostly plastid markers have led to the current classification of magnoliids into four orders and 18 families. However, uncertainty remains regarding the placement of several families. MethodsHere we present the first comprehensive phylogenomic analysis of Magnoliidae as a whole, sampling 235 species from 199 (74%) genera and representing all families and most previously accepted subfamilies and tribes. We analyze newly generated data from the Angiosperms353 probe set using both coalescent and concatenation analyses and testing the impact of multiple filtering and alignment strategies. ResultsWhile our results generally provide further support for previously established phylogenetic relationships in both magnoliids as a whole and large families including Annonaceae and Lauraceae, they also provide new evidence for previously ambiguous relationships. In particular, we find support for the position of Hydnoraceae as sister to the remainder of Piperales and, for the first time, resolve the backbone of relationships among most genera of Myristicaceae. ConclusionsAlthough some of our results are limited by low gene recovery for a number of taxa and significant gene tree conflict for some relationships, this study represents a significant step towards reconstructing the evolutionary history of a major lineage of angiosperms. Based on these results, we present an updated phylogenetic classification for Magnoliidae, recognizing 21 families, summarizing previously established subfamilies and tribes, and describing new tribes for Myristicaceae.

Bees are major pollinators of flowering plants and thus are important ecosystem service providers for natural habitats and crops. Evolution led to a wide range of adaptations in behaviors, morphology and ecological traits. Many plants rely on specialized bee species for pollination events, and so this interdependence can make them increasingly vulnerable to ongoing threats of habitat loss and pesticide exposure. Studying the genomes of bee species across different life histories and ecological specializations can help understand the evolution of these traits more generally, but also inform conservation efforts for Camptopoeum friesei specifically. Here, we present the reference genome of the solitary bee Camptopoeum friesei (Arthropoda; Insecta; Hymenoptera; Andrenidae). C. friesei is highly dependent on steppe habitats where it nests in saline soils. Further, it is highly specialized (oligolectic) on a few Asteraceae: Centaurea and Cirsium, in particular on Centaurea stoebe. As a consequence of its high specialization level, it is of its ecological niche with an extremely scattered and rare habitat, C. friesei is highly threatened in central Europe, albeit local aggregations can be rich in individuals. The high-quality genome assembly for the colourful bee Camptopoeum friesei was generated using long-read PacBio HiFi in combination with chromatin conformation capture (Hi-C) sequencing. The genome spans 367.7 megabases (Mb), N50 of 25.2 Mb. The majority of the assembly is scaffolded into 10 chromosomes and harbours [~]40% repeats. Species taxonomyEukaryota; Opisthokonta; Metazoa; Eumetazoa; Bilateria; Protostomia; Ecdysozoa; Panarthropoda; Arthropoda; Mandibulata; Pancrustacea; Hexapoda; Insecta; Dicondylia; Pterygota; Neoptera; Endopterygota; Hymenoptera; Apocrita; Aculeata; Apoidea; Anthophila; Andrenidae; Panurginae; Panurgini; Camptopoeum friesei Mocsary, 1894 (NCBI:txid2918745)

Despite a global distribution throughout the tropics and sub-tropics, the order Schizomida (Arachnida) is heavily understudied and the phylogeny of the group is poorly understood. Identification keys are only available for some regions or genera but not for the entire order. (1) comprehensively reviewed the entire schizomid fauna and established a suite of characters to define all genera known at this time. This suite of characters still depicts the foundation of modern descriptions, supplemented by recently established characters, most of them documenting setation patterns on pedipalps, flagellum and chelicerae. In this paper, we present the Schizomida Trait Data Base (STDB) containing data for 25 characters based on the entire body of schizomid literature. Characters were chosen based on their use for modern taxonomic description and availability of the data. The STDB is a powerful tool that can be used by both amateurs and experienced researchers to categorise newly found specimens, both extant and fossil, down to genus level easily. Analysis using the new database gives insight into biogeographical patterns of characters. Furthermore, we are describing a new species,{dagger} Annazomus jamesi, a fossil specimen from Burmese (Kachin) amber and investigate a small collection of extant schizomids from Ecuador, which includes the previously unrecorded female of Surazomus palenque, herein described for the first time. The taxonomic assignment of both specimens is based on the STDB, highlighting the utility of the new data base approach to schizomid systematics. Arachnids, biogeography, Cretaceous, data base, fossil, new species, palaeontology, Schizomida, statistics, taxonomy